The 100th
anniversary of the RAN in Australia
is a current topic. The fire works and light display was televised the other
night. I can sympathise with the team who created the visual history which was
shone onto the sides of the Opera House and the pylons of the Harbour Bridge .
To condense the entire 100 year history to about 30 minutes would be no easy
matter. I have enough trouble condensing all the information I want to impart
about the landing at Anzac into a couple of hundred pages, so I can appreciate
the challenge they were faced with. What do you put in? What do you leave out?
What do you emphasise, and what do you play down?
I noticed they
briefly mentioned the operations in the Pacific to get rid of the German
Pacific Fleet in 1914, and then a slightly more detailed account (maybe a full
5 seconds) of the battle between the Sydney and
the Emden .
In The Anzac legend I have “devoted” a page
to the operations in the Pacific and another few panels on the Sydney/Emden
fight (hardly enough for either).
Of note here is
that the Australian and New
Zealand operations in the Western Pacific
region forced the German Pacific Fleet to quit the region and sail to the east
where it met and defeated a weak British naval force in the Battle of Coronel.
It then sailed to the South Atlantic, where it was destroyed by an avenging
Royal Navy task force in the Battle of the Falklands in Dec 1914. They were two of the few times
that the two sides came to serious blows before the Gallipoli Campaign. The naval
war turned into a blockade, which locked the German Fleet into its port until after
the Gallipoli campaign and the Battle of Jutland in 1916.
As I outline in
another episode, Churchill and Lord Jackie Fisher wanted to utilise their
powerful Navy in the War, but the German’s wouldn’t come out to fight. Looking
for other options was one of the many
contributing factors which led to the adoption of the Dardenelles Plan,
resulting in the landings at Gallipoli.
That’s a very
brief overview, and does not include the smaller battles and the losses to
submarines the British suffered up to that time.
Last night on the
news they showed a report on the commemoration of the Sydney-Emden battle. It
was interesting to hear what the German Naval officer said in his speech when
he said- when two nations fight against
each other within the bounds of humanity and rules of warfare, that afterwards
they can come together as friends; - or words to that effect. How true is
that? Let’s say it makes it a lot easier to share a common ground and know that
they can look the other side in the eye afterwards with no sense of shame.
After the Sydney took the Emden ’s
crew on board as prisoners they sailed to Colombo ,
Sri Langka, where the Anzac convoy had sailed to and was waiting. As they
approached the port, the Captain of the Sydney
radioed ahead to the Anzac convoy saying that out of respect for the wounded
German prisoners on board, that no cheering, etc should accompany the Sydney ’s arrival, as it
would be like rubbing salt into their wounds and in bad taste in respect to the
defeated Germans. I think that says a lot about the respect between foes that
the German naval officer was talking about this week.
That said, war is
war. Nasty and rude. It’s a shame that it is has to be held up as an example of
what is good, and what is bad in humanity. Because that is what war does – it
brings out the best and the worst in human nature. That is something I am
trying to portray in The Anzac Legend.
It is difficult to condense what you want to say into a few words or pages. It comes down to making decisions as to what tells the story as you see it, I think. War is not a good thing.
ReplyDeleteYou're right Kate. Hopefully I make the right decisions. Thanks for your comments.
ReplyDelete